https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9257
Bug ID: 9257
Summary: Abstract attribute types can be instantiated
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
If you add 'name' or 'distinguishedName' attributes somewhere they are added
seamlessly.
However, these attributes are SLAP_AT_ABSTRACT, which
> slap.h: #define SLAP_AT_ABSTRACT 0x0100U /* cannot be instantiated */
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9267
Issue ID: 9267
Summary: libldap incorrectly accepts IP addresses in cert
subject field as valid
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.50
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
With a cert that has no subjectAltName, and has an IP address in the subject,
ldap client connections are still made instead of rejected. This appears to
violate RFC 4513, section 3.1.3:
The server's identity may also be verified by comparing the reference
identity to the Common Name (CN) [RFC4519] value in the leaf Relative
Distinguished Name (RDN) of the subjectName field of the server's
certificate. This comparison is performed using the rules for
comparison of DNS names in Section 3.1.3.1, below, with the exception
that no wildcard matching is allowed. Although the use of the Common
Name value is existing practice, it is deprecated, and Certification
Authorities are encouraged to provide subjectAltName values instead.
Note that the TLS implementation may represent DNs in certificates
according to X.500 or other conventions. For example, some X.500
implementations order the RDNs in a DN using a left-to-right (most
significant to least significant) convention instead of LDAP's
right-to-left convention.
I do know we have an exception to the above in relation to wildcards in
subject, since many CAs only issue certs that way (or at least did so at the
time).
However that still revolves around DNS names. The acceptance of IP addresses
is a separate matter and seems like it should be treated as a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7501
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |---
--- Comment #12 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #10)
> Need to confirm that dynamic config conversion still works.
conversion works
> Need to ensure similar support in back-meta (back-asyncmeta too?)
Support exists
> Need to examine the bits that use #if 0 (comment#1)
Looks fine
Fixed in 2.4.34
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9059
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• 709d805f
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-05-22T16:57:53+00:00
ITS#9059 Skip mincsn check if sessionlog replay was successful
• f3952d94
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-05-22T16:57:53+00:00
ITS#9059 Document why we do FIND_CSN
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9165
--- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Side note: there were no security issues with the code, but it did have room
for improvement which has now been done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9165
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |TEST
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
• 57d5aefe
by Howard Chu at 2020-05-20T19:58:28+01:00
ITS#9165 Fix pageedResults cookie printing
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8376
--- Comment #16 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Suspending until someone cares to work on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8376
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8376
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, |
|OL_2_5_REQ, |
|openldap-scratch |
Resolution|--- |SUSPENDED
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8835
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |---
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.