openldap-bugs April 2020

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

2 participants
338 discussions

[Bug 8383] msys build error "portable.h:1116:19: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8383 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST --- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 27545be4 by Ryan Tandy at 2020-04-03T16:59:15+00:00 ITS#8383 Look for socklen_t in <ws2tcpip.h> too MinGW targets do not have the <sys/socket.h> header. The configure check would conclude that there is no socklen_t type, resulting in portable.h containing its own definition of socklen_t, which would later conflict with the actual definition in <ws2tcpip.h>. Add <ws2tcpip.h> to the configure check for socklen_t, so that the defined type is correctly detected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9181] Non-initialised global options mutex causes problems on Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

1 0

[Bug 6207] Build farm
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6207] Build farm
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6207] Build farm
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 6d9e9e6c by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-04-03T09:47:46+01:00 ITS#6207 Print out test timings • e0c80d6b by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-04-03T10:27:03+01:00 ITS#6207 Add GitLab CI -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8528] Incorrect results on replace op for olcAccess
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8528 --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:59:46PM +0000, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: >> Not saying it's a bad idea, but the interactions with a delete mod might be >> a little confusing: > > Well, that's why I limited the scope of this bug purely to replace ops where > the entire structure is getting replaced. For add/delete, it must not re-order > anything. Not so sure about that, my thinking is a replace: attr should be equal to delete: attr - add: attr replaced values And you're now saying that's not the case anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9181] Non-initialised global options mutex causes problems on Windows
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Apr '20

02 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9181 --- Comment #5 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- Hi Howard, I'm testing my patch for ITS#8383 and this one seems to have broken the build in my MSYS2/MinGW environment: cc -g -O2 -I../../include -I../../include -c -o ntservice.o ntservice.c In file included from ../../include/portable.h:1173, from ntservice.c:20: ../../include/ldap_int_thread.h:156:43: error: unknown type name 'ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_t'; did you mean 'ldap_int_thread_mutex_t'? 156 | ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_init_first LDAP_P(( ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_t *mutex )); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../../include/ldap_cdefs.h:32:25: note: in definition of macro 'LDAP_P' 32 | # define LDAP_P(protos) protos | ^~~~~~ make[2]: *** [<builtin>: ntservice.o] Error 1 ldap_int_thread.h is included at the top of ldap_pvt_thread.h, so this declaration is seen before the ldap_pvt_* typedefs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8383] msys build error "portable.h:1116:19: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Apr '20

02 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8383 --- Comment #4 from Ryan Tandy <ryan(a)openldap.org> --- Thanks Quanah for spending some time on this with me. I note this bug occurs under MSYS2 when running the "MSYS2 MinGW 64-bit" environment (MSYSTEM=MINGW64). It does not occur under the "MSYS2 MSYS" environment (MSYSTEM=MSYS). Quanah's build system seems a bit unique (MSYSTEM=MSYS but adding /mingw64/bin to PATH, possibly other differences too). I think my patch is a correct fix for people wanting to build under a pure MinGW environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8729] saslregex mapping failure
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Apr '20

02 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8729 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9156] latest ppolicy draft support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Apr '20

02 Apr '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9156 --- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #5) > > Hi David, > could you show a configuration when this happens? I cannot reproduce > either issue on master. > > I will update the manpage to mention pwdLastSuccess is used. > > > - pwdStartTime, pwdEndTime: OK, but there is no special ppolicy code returned, > > and if I read correctly the draft > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-behera-ldap-password-policy-10#section-7.1), > > an "accountLocked" extended error code should be triggered. > > Again, can't seem to be able to reproduce that and test022-ppolicy > passes for me. Hi David, Can you provide the requested info? Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs April 2020