https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
--- Comment #11 from maxime.besson(a)worteks.com <maxime.besson(a)worteks.com> ---
My original report mentions it: candidates[ i ].sr_msgid is -1
(META_MSGID_IGNORE)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
--- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Ok, it is halting on this check:
assert( candidates[ i ].sr_msgid >= 0 || candidates[ i ].sr_msgid ==
META_MSGID_CONNECTING );
So what we need is in thread 1, frame 2, to know what the value of
candidates[i].sr_msgid is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098
--- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to maxime.besson(a)worteks.com from comment #7)
> Created attachment 704 [details]
> assert backtrace
>
> A little bird told be this report was missing a backtrace.
What we need is a full backtrace. ;)
thr apply all bt full
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8296
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FEEDBACK |SUSPENDED
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8296
--- Comment #11 from maurizio.lattuada(a)gmail.com <maurizio.lattuada(a)gmail.com> ---
Hi Quanah,
unfortunately I'm not working on that project anymore (not for that company
too), so I had not anymore the chance to figure it out.
Sorry for that.
Cheers,
Maurizio
Il giorno dom 22 mar 2020 alle ore 01:53 <openldap-its(a)openldap.org> ha
scritto:
> https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8296
>
> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
> Resolution|--- |FEEDBACK
>
> --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
> Hi Maurizio,
>
> Do you still hit this issue with the current release? I apologize for the
> delay in response. Numerous fixes and changes have been made to syncprov
> since
> this was filed.
>
> Regards,
> Quanah
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9179
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9205
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9121
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9121
--- Comment #4 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #3)
> Current code periodically triggers a SEGV in test044:
fixed in 5bfd8d88887eff4581463cb20f9262bf51686908
>
> (gdb) cont
> Continuing.
> [New Thread 0x7fd9d2ce2700 (LWP 18294)]
> [New Thread 0x7fd9d24e1700 (LWP 18295)]
>
> Thread 3 "lt-slapd" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7fd9d2ce2700 (LWP 18294)]
> 0x00007fd9d42a697c in comp_candidates (op=0x7fd9c4002900,
> rtxn=0x7fd9c410ad10, mra=0x7fd9c4005430, f=0x1c, ids=0x7fd9d0c5f018,
> tmp=0x7fd9d095f018, stack=0x7fd9d0d5f018)
> at filterindex.c:464
> 464 filterindex.c: No such file or directory.
>
>
> #0 0x00007fd9d42a697c in comp_candidates (op=0x7fd9c4002900,
> rtxn=0x7fd9c410ad10, mra=0x7fd9c4005430, f=0x1c, ids=0x7fd9d0c5f018,
> tmp=0x7fd9d095f018, stack=0x7fd9d0d5f018)
> at filterindex.c:464
> rc = 1409434333
> #1 0x00007fd9d42a6bb2 in ext_candidates (op=0x7fd9c4002900,
> rtxn=0x7fd9c410ad10, mra=0x7fd9c4005430, ids=0x7fd9d0c5f018,
> tmp=0x7fd9d095f018, stack=0x7fd9d0d5f018)
> at filterindex.c:507
> No locals.
> #2 0x00007fd9d42a5c0f in mdb_filter_candidates (op=0x7fd9c4002900,
> rtxn=0x7fd9c410ad10, f=0x7fd9c4005410, ids=0x7fd9d0c5f018,
> tmp=0x7fd9d095f018, stack=0x7fd9d0d5f018)
> at filterindex.c:206
> rc = 0
> aa = 0x7fd9c40016c0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.