https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9200
Bug ID: 9200
Summary: 2.4 to 2.5 upgrade documentation
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
For the 2.5 release, we need to document the upgrade procedures for moving from
OpenLDAP 2.4 to OpenLDAP 2.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9220
Bug ID: 9220
Summary: Rewrite Bind and Exop result handling
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Bind and Exop result handling needs a rewrite so it is no longer a special case
for overlays.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9211
Bug ID: 9211
Summary: Relax control is not consistently access-restricted
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.49
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ryan(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following operations can be performed by anyone having 'write' access (not
even 'manage') using the Relax control:
- modifying/replacing structural objectClass
- adding/modifying OBSOLETE attributes
Some operations are correctly restricted:
- adding/modifying NO-USER-MODIFICATION attributes marked as manageable
(Modification of non-conformant objects doesn't appear to be implemented at
all.)
In the absence of ACLs for controls, I'm of the opinion that all use of the
Relax control should require manage access. The Relax draft clearly and
repeatedly discusses its use cases in terms of directory _administrators_
temporarily relaxing constraints in order to accomplish a specific task.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9186
Bug ID: 9186
Summary: RFE: More metrics in cn=monitor
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
Currently I'm grepping metrics from syslog with mtail:
https://gitlab.com/ae-dir/ansible-ae-dir-server/-/blob/master/templates/mta…
With a new binary logging this is not possible anymore.
Thus it would be nice if cn=monitor provides more metrics.
1. Overall connection count per listener starting at 0 when started. This would
be a simple counter added to:
entries cn=Listener 0,cn=Listeners,cn=Monitor
2. Counter for the various "deferring" messages separated by the reason for
deferring.
3. Counters for all possible result codes. In my mtail program I also label it
with the result type.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224
Bug ID: 9224
Summary: Add support for PREPARE/2-phase commit
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
In LMDB, add support for PREPARE/2-phase commits
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9219
Bug ID: 9219
Summary: Streamline tool API for 2.5
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The current tool API is a mess and needs fixing for 2.5. This affects things
like slapacl (The fix for bug#7920 was a kludge to deal with this, needs
revisiting).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9241
Bug ID: 9241
Summary: olcRefintNothing refuse to accept space in the target
dn
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.49
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: sebastien.chaumat(a)qspin.be
Target Milestone: ---
When configuring refint :
dn: olcOverlay={2}refint,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config
objectClass: olcOverlayConfig
objectClass: olcRefintConfig
olcOverlay: {2}refint
olcRefintAttribute: seeAlso
olcRefintNothing: cn=admin,dc=test
is accepted
but
olcRefintNothing: cn=admin space,dc=test
is rejected when I ldapadd the configuration with the message :
ldap_add: Constraint violation (19)
additional info: <olcRefintNothing> extra cruft after <string>
I tried various quoting :
cn="admin space",dc=test
cn=admin\20space
"cn=admin space"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9199
Bug ID: 9199
Summary: Disable IPv6 makes listener work on IP address but
hostname or localhost
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.49
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: st-wong(a)cuhk.edu.hk
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
We're compiling 2.4.49 on CentOS8.
Make test fails at "test000-rootdse" with error Can't contact LDAP server.
Debug log shows error "Address already in use".
We're quite sure the port (9011) is not in use.
Starting slapd with test command verified the error:
../servers/slapd/slapd -f testrun/slapd.1.conf -h ldap://localhost:9011
Found that it's okay to start slapd if listener URL is using IP address
instead.
Checked ldap_url_parse* call may not work as expected with V6 disabled
(configure option --disable-ipv6).
Re-do configuration and make without "--disable-ipv6" works as expected.
Would you help? Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.