openldap-bugs April 2010

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

45 participants
233 discussions

Re: ITS#6055
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

> Can you give me the exact commands I need to put into the wiki, for a > user to go from a checkout of OpenLDAP, to a build with this module > installed just like all the others? Assuming one builds in the tree, - follow instructions for anonymous CVS checkout of HEAD branch <http://www.openldap.org/software/repo.html#AnonCVS> - cd contrib/slapd-modules/samba4 - edit Makefile if needed; as it is, it assumes you build in tree, and installs in /usr/local/libexec/openldap - make; make install - in slapd.conf: modulepath /usr/local/libexec/openldap moduleload rdnval.la # ... database hdb # ... overlay rdnval That's it. p.

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by abartlet＠samba.org 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

--=-GJES2Ff4FHn/Nl+ftOBF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 05:42 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: > > My eventual goal is that folks using a Ubuntu or Fedora system would > > have Samba4 'just work' with the packaged OpenLDAP. I can of course > > lobby them to get their packages updated to build from contrib, but it'= s > > easier if it's just in there.=3D20 > > > > Similarly, when I ask folks to configure with 'OpenLDAP HEAD' in the > > short term, it is of course easier for me if everything is already in > > place.=3D20 > > > > But this is your project, not mine, and I am happy with whatever we can > > make work.=3D20 >=20 > Right now, along the lines illustrated by Howard, I've committed > everything to contrib/slapd-modules/samba4. You may need to tweak the > Makefile if you are not building in the source tree (as I usually do; the= n > adjust LDAP_BUILD to your build tree), and if you wish to install modules > in some specific place (prefix, exec_prefix, ldap_subdir). >=20 > My medium term objective would be to have: >=20 > - generally useful modules built-in (e.g. slapo-deref) >=20 > - Samba4-specific modules all in one contrib directory, possibly > harmonized and consolidated when possible in a single module, to ease > configuration and maintenance >=20 > The latter could then have a specific configure, if needed, so that > packagers could make and install them as easily as possible. In the > meanwhile, we should live with this interim solution. Time permitting, I > see no issue in maintaining that code, much like we already do with the > other modules. Can you give me the exact commands I need to put into the wiki, for a user to go from a checkout of OpenLDAP, to a build with this module installed just like all the others? Thanks, --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. --=-GJES2Ff4FHn/Nl+ftOBF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLznxIz4A8Wyi0NrsRAl6mAJ4+rykBiTBAhn3ANiDgEfc8dG1OAgCghGeg ycx5bF3Vlb1Yx3OMwa3p13k= =XUh6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GJES2Ff4FHn/Nl+ftOBF--

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

> My eventual goal is that folks using a Ubuntu or Fedora system would > have Samba4 'just work' with the packaged OpenLDAP. I can of course > lobby them to get their packages updated to build from contrib, but it's > easier if it's just in there.=20 > > Similarly, when I ask folks to configure with 'OpenLDAP HEAD' in the > short term, it is of course easier for me if everything is already in > place.=20 > > But this is your project, not mine, and I am happy with whatever we can > make work.=20 Right now, along the lines illustrated by Howard, I've committed everything to contrib/slapd-modules/samba4. You may need to tweak the Makefile if you are not building in the source tree (as I usually do; then adjust LDAP_BUILD to your build tree), and if you wish to install modules in some specific place (prefix, exec_prefix, ldap_subdir). My medium term objective would be to have: - generally useful modules built-in (e.g. slapo-deref) - Samba4-specific modules all in one contrib directory, possibly harmonized and consolidated when possible in a single module, to ease configuration and maintenance The latter could then have a specific configure, if needed, so that packagers could make and install them as easily as possible. In the meanwhile, we should live with this interim solution. Time permitting, I see no issue in maintaining that code, much like we already do with the other modules. p.

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by abartlet＠samba.org 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

--=-dnOZfedjaeI8f/8PVlNm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 04:32 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: > > My only concern is that it be maintained, so that the OpenLDAP backend > > can be a supported part of Samba4 into the long term. (I know it's not > > been in good shape for the past while, but there is hope we can get it > > back on track). > > > > Do contrib modules come with this level of maintenance? >=20 > Inherently no, because they would not be configured/built along with the > rest of the package. Of course, as soon as users (possibly including > myself) notice issues, they would be maintained (see for example nssov). >=20 > The most straightforward way of having it routinely built is to place it > in slapd/overlays/; I guess this needs consensus from the rest of the > team. I'd vote in favor; please holler. My eventual goal is that folks using a Ubuntu or Fedora system would have Samba4 'just work' with the packaged OpenLDAP. I can of course lobby them to get their packages updated to build from contrib, but it's easier if it's just in there.=20 Similarly, when I ask folks to configure with 'OpenLDAP HEAD' in the short term, it is of course easier for me if everything is already in place.=20 But this is your project, not mine, and I am happy with whatever we can make work.=20 Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. --=-dnOZfedjaeI8f/8PVlNm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLzmzwz4A8Wyi0NrsRAomfAJ9J4b76Ujcu5fC3Yig3lgIBJ712ywCeOw3U fDuSKTOqEEfK1JEriBOcJ8g= =FSwh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dnOZfedjaeI8f/8PVlNm--

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

> masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: >>> My only concern is that it be maintained, so that the OpenLDAP backend >>> can be a supported part of Samba4 into the long term. (I know it's not >>> been in good shape for the past while, but there is hope we can get it >>> back on track). >>> >>> Do contrib modules come with this level of maintenance? >> >> Inherently no, because they would not be configured/built along with the >> rest of the package. Of course, as soon as users (possibly including >> myself) notice issues, they would be maintained (see for example nssov). >> >> The most straightforward way of having it routinely built is to place it >> in slapd/overlays/; I guess this needs consensus from the rest of the >> team. I'd vote in favor; please holler. > > I think contrib is the right place for now. It seems to me that the > requirements here are still a moving target, so it's better in contrib. > (Contrib items are free to add new features independent of the rest of the > release cycle. Items in the main slapd/overlays are more constrained to > bugfixes-only within a release cycle.) Fair enough. I've started committing stuff to contrib/slapd-modules/samba4 p.

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by hyc＠symas.com 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: >> My only concern is that it be maintained, so that the OpenLDAP backend >> can be a supported part of Samba4 into the long term. (I know it's not >> been in good shape for the past while, but there is hope we can get it >> back on track). >> >> Do contrib modules come with this level of maintenance? > > Inherently no, because they would not be configured/built along with the > rest of the package. Of course, as soon as users (possibly including > myself) notice issues, they would be maintained (see for example nssov). > > The most straightforward way of having it routinely built is to place it > in slapd/overlays/; I guess this needs consensus from the rest of the > team. I'd vote in favor; please holler. I think contrib is the right place for now. It seems to me that the requirements here are still a moving target, so it's better in contrib. (Contrib items are free to add new features independent of the rest of the release cycle. Items in the main slapd/overlays are more constrained to bugfixes-only within a release cycle.) -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

> My only concern is that it be maintained, so that the OpenLDAP backend > can be a supported part of Samba4 into the long term. (I know it's not > been in good shape for the past while, but there is hope we can get it > back on track). > > Do contrib modules come with this level of maintenance? Inherently no, because they would not be configured/built along with the rest of the package. Of course, as soon as users (possibly including myself) notice issues, they would be maintained (see for example nssov). The most straightforward way of having it routinely built is to place it in slapd/overlays/; I guess this needs consensus from the rest of the team. I'd vote in favor; please holler. p.

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by abartlet＠samba.org 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

--=-plI2z6xrAOfHgQ7f8NT2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 03:44 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:37 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: > >> > That's no problem at all. > >> > >> Good. This version explicitly check for instantiation as global, and > >> also > >> does some further sanity checks prior to startup. > >> > >> <ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/pierangelo-masarati-2010-04-20-rdnval= .2.c> > >> > >> > It now just fails in the same was as without > >> > the patch. I'll mention it on openldap-technical if I can't get > >> > assistance on #ldap. > >> > >> Not quite clear what patch and what failure you refer to. Anyway, I'v= e > >> tested this version of the overlay as global (refuses to start) and on= a > >> database, either empty or populated, and it works as intended. Please > >> test and report. Thanks, p. > > > > It seems to be working well. When can I expect it to be in the tree? > > > > (I'll then require folks to use the current OpenLDAP CVS if they want t= o > > use the LDAP backend). >=20 > I can commit it in a minute. It's not 100% clear to me what's the most > appropriate location: slapd/overlays/ may not, as this looks like > something definitely specific to Samba4; probably, contrib/slapd-modules/ > is more appropriate. Perhaps, a contrib/slapd-modules/samba4/ would be > the most appropriate, along with future specific (i.e. not of general > usefulness) modules, as we did for the nssov module. >=20 > Comments? I mean, from others, not only from you :) My only concern is that it be maintained, so that the OpenLDAP backend can be a supported part of Samba4 into the long term. (I know it's not been in good shape for the past while, but there is hope we can get it back on track).=20 Do contrib modules come with this level of maintenance? Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. --=-plI2z6xrAOfHgQ7f8NT2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLzmHxz4A8Wyi0NrsRAlF3AKCXBqb/jzSgemy/GREWapoan6QkVwCgj1of Dmourk1xQiMAlvWFJocYuSQ= =rE8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-plI2z6xrAOfHgQ7f8NT2--

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by masarati＠aero.polimi.it 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:37 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: >> > That's no problem at all. >> >> Good. This version explicitly check for instantiation as global, and >> also >> does some further sanity checks prior to startup. >> >> <ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/pierangelo-masarati-2010-04-20-rdnval.2.c> >> >> > It now just fails in the same was as without >> > the patch. I'll mention it on openldap-technical if I can't get >> > assistance on #ldap. >> >> Not quite clear what patch and what failure you refer to. Anyway, I've >> tested this version of the overlay as global (refuses to start) and on a >> database, either empty or populated, and it works as intended. Please >> test and report. Thanks, p. > > It seems to be working well. When can I expect it to be in the tree? > > (I'll then require folks to use the current OpenLDAP CVS if they want to > use the LDAP backend). I can commit it in a minute. It's not 100% clear to me what's the most appropriate location: slapd/overlays/ may not, as this looks like something definitely specific to Samba4; probably, contrib/slapd-modules/ is more appropriate. Perhaps, a contrib/slapd-modules/samba4/ would be the most appropriate, along with future specific (i.e. not of general usefulness) modules, as we did for the nssov module. Comments? I mean, from others, not only from you :) p.

1 0

Re: ITS#6055
by abartlet＠samba.org 20 Apr '10

20 Apr '10

--=-u2bdcYXWzM+LH/qgpb9q Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:37 +0200, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote: > > That's no problem at all. >=20 > Good. This version explicitly check for instantiation as global, and als= o > does some further sanity checks prior to startup. >=20 > <ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/pierangelo-masarati-2010-04-20-rdnval.2.= c> >=20 > > It now just fails in the same was as without > > the patch. I'll mention it on openldap-technical if I can't get > > assistance on #ldap. >=20 > Not quite clear what patch and what failure you refer to. Anyway, I've > tested this version of the overlay as global (refuses to start) and on a > database, either empty or populated, and it works as intended. Please > test and report. Thanks, p. It seems to be working well. When can I expect it to be in the tree? (I'll then require folks to use the current OpenLDAP CVS if they want to use the LDAP backend). Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. --=-u2bdcYXWzM+LH/qgpb9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLzldRz4A8Wyi0NrsRAgzTAJ4lv6P1wia2JLA7L2jPNkpgEvX3FwCgqyY0 jrguLg5MsW14D6wPlNThuko= =F1ZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u2bdcYXWzM+LH/qgpb9q--

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs April 2010