On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> > I recently installed some updates and configuration changes on one of my
> > LDAP slaves. Replication broke mysteriously after that. The only thing logged
> > was "slapd[30723]: do_syncrepl: rid 001 retrying (9 retries left)"
>
> What log level?
"none". I also changed the level to "-1" and nothing popped out at me.
Howard says there should have been some packet dumps that would have
included the protocol error, but I must have missed them amoungst all the
noise of level -1. A nice error message at "none' would have helped.
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | henson(a)csupomona.edu
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
Pierangelo Masarati <ando(a)sys-net.it> writes:
> dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> test036 fails constantly with following error:
>> ...
>> Using ldapsearch to retrieve all the entries...
>> Filtering ldapsearch results...
>> Filtering original ldif used to create database...
>> Comparing filter output...
>> comparison failed - slapd-meta search/modification didn't succeed
>> diff -i ldapsearch.flt ldif.flt > diff.out
>
> I hate to say this, but... works for me, even with -i.
OK, I have to accept this. As my local CVS tree is only a weeky update
and not a fresh checkout there might be some errors in the test
scripts, as -iB works for me, I leave it as is. Please close this its.
-Dieter
--
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://www.dkluenter.de
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
53°08'09,95"N
10°08'02,42"E
dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote:
> Hi,
> test036 fails constantly with following error:
> ...
> Using ldapsearch to retrieve all the entries...
> Filtering ldapsearch results...
> Filtering original ldif used to create database...
> Comparing filter output...
> comparison failed - slapd-meta search/modification didn't succeed
>
> diff -i ldapsearch.flt ldif.flt > diff.out
I hate to say this, but... works for me, even with -i.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
-----------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Fax: +39 0382 476497
Email: ando(a)sys-net.it
-----------------------------------
henson(a)acm.org wrote:
> I recently installed some updates and configuration changes on one of my
> LDAP slaves. Replication broke mysteriously after that. The only thing logged
> was "slapd[30723]: do_syncrepl: rid 001 retrying (9 retries left)"
What log level?
p.
> I finally figured out that the search was failing with a protocol error because
> derefAliases was set to always, a setting I had just added. It would be useful
> if replication failure provided better error messages, something in the logs
> indicating that a protocol error had occurred because of an invalid
> dereferencing setting would have saved me a lot of time.
>
> In addition, if it is a protocol error to dereference aliases in the context of
> syncrepl, shouldn't the server just ignore that global configuration setting and
> just do the right thing?
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
-----------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Fax: +39 0382 476497
Email: ando(a)sys-net.it
-----------------------------------
Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> writes:
> dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote:
>> Full_Name: Dieter Kluenter
>> Version: HEAD
>> OS: Linux x86_64
>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>> Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.215.25)
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> test036 fails constantly with following error:
>> ...
>> Using ldapsearch to retrieve all the entries...
>> Filtering ldapsearch results...
>> Filtering original ldif used to create database...
>> Comparing filter output...
>> comparison failed - slapd-meta search/modification didn't succeed
>
> If your HEAD snapshot is before this commit, then it's a known issue
> and this ITS will be closed.
>
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-commit/200807/msg00174.html
No, it is a cvs update from last night.
-Dieter
--
Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung
http://www.dkluenter.de
GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6
dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote:
> Full_Name: Dieter Kluenter
> Version: HEAD
> OS: Linux x86_64
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.215.25)
>
>
> Hi,
> test036 fails constantly with following error:
> ...
> Using ldapsearch to retrieve all the entries...
> Filtering ldapsearch results...
> Filtering original ldif used to create database...
> Comparing filter output...
> comparison failed - slapd-meta search/modification didn't succeed
If your HEAD snapshot is before this commit, then it's a known issue and this
ITS will be closed.
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-commit/200807/msg00174.html
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 17, 2008 6:19 AM +0000 marco.walther(a)sun.com wrote:
>
>> Full_Name: Marco Walther
>> Version: 2.4.11
>> OS: SunOS 5.11 snv_70b sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC
>> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>> Submission from: (NULL) (192.18.43.225)
>
> No openldap release supports BDB 4.7 yet. There is already a bug filed on
> this issue, and it will be addressed in an upcoming release.
#5530. This ITS will be closed as a dup of #5530.
Hacking the BDB source to expose the private field certainly works for now,
but we'll be looking at a hands-off fix later.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/