------=_Part_27665_28430263.1199452056921
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Yes, you are completely right. The only reason I can think of using the
DN version is because you are forced by your schema (attribute types for the
expansion source attribute differ). I emphasize that the implementation of
both is quite different. The DN version uses recursivity while the URL
version relies in slapd's search-reply mechanism. I just added the first one
as an example.
URL version is much more powerful and more elegant. You suggested
subGroupURL: ldap:///<dn>??base, but even subGroupURL: ldap:///<dn> works ok
(if I remember right).
------=_Part_27665_28430263.1199452056921
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br> Yes, you are completely right. The only reason I can think of using the DN version is because you are forced by your schema (attribute types for the expansion source attribute differ). I emphasize that the implementation of both is quite different. The DN version uses recursivity while the URL version relies in slapd's search-reply mechanism. I just added the first one as an example.
<br><br> URL version is much more powerful and more elegant. You suggested subGroupURL: ldap:///<dn>??base, but even subGroupURL: ldap:///<dn> works ok (if I remember right).<br><br>
------=_Part_27665_28430263.1199452056921--