Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by hyc＠symas.com
ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com wrote:
> Depends on the time you have I suppose.
>
> I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?
>
> If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?
Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release to
refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP.
Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining devel
ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5 as-is.
--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
15 years, 11 months
Re: (ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by zhangweiwu＠realss.com
在 2007-07-01日的 10:11 +0200，Hallvard B Furuseth写道：
> zhangweiwu(a)realss.com writes:
> > The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual,
>
> It is now, since OpenLDAP 2.3.28 I think. Maybe you've got older
> manuals than binaries, or multiple OpenLDAP installations.
Yes you are right. 2.3.27 version on SuSE has this option missing in
manual, but 2.3.30 on Gentoo Linux have this option in manual. My
mistake on not checking carefully the newer version. Thanks for closing
this issue.
15 years, 11 months
Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by ghenry＠suretecsystems.com
<quote who="Hallvard B Furuseth">
> Gavin Henry writes:
>><quote who="Pierangelo Masarati">
>>> In re23 slapo-rwm should not be used in conjunction with other
>>> overlays; there is a number of reports about interoperability issues,
>>> (...)
>> That's strange though, as I merely followed the slapd-ldap(5) man page:
>> (...)
>> Maybe a man page patch is needed to stop others hitting this.
>
> I'll insert "OpenLDAP 2.3, rwm should not be used in conjunction with
> other overlays." in slapo-rwm(5), slapd-ldap(5) and slapd-relay(5)
> unless someone has a better idea.
>
> Or since Pierangelo followed up with
> "it interacts poorly with other, more recent overlays."
If you stop ^^ here, then you might as well use your first sentence.
> should it be "...unless you know what you are doing" in the backend docs
> and a more detailed instruction in slapo-rwm(5)?
Depends on the time you have I suppose.
I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?
If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hallvard
>
15 years, 11 months
Re: (ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no
zhangweiwu(a)realss.com writes:
> The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual,
It is now, since OpenLDAP 2.3.28 I think. Maybe you've got older
manuals than binaries, or multiple OpenLDAP installations.
--
Regards,
Hallvard
15 years, 11 months
Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no
Gavin Henry writes:
><quote who="Pierangelo Masarati">
>> In re23 slapo-rwm should not be used in conjunction with other
>> overlays; there is a number of reports about interoperability issues,
>> (...)
> That's strange though, as I merely followed the slapd-ldap(5) man page:
> (...)
> Maybe a man page patch is needed to stop others hitting this.
I'll insert "OpenLDAP 2.3, rwm should not be used in conjunction with
other overlays." in slapo-rwm(5), slapd-ldap(5) and slapd-relay(5)
unless someone has a better idea.
Or since Pierangelo followed up with
"it interacts poorly with other, more recent overlays."
should it be "...unless you know what you are doing" in the backend docs
and a more detailed instruction in slapo-rwm(5)?
--
Regards,
Hallvard
15 years, 11 months
(ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by zhangweiwu＠realss.com
Full_Name: Zhang Weiwu
Version: 2.3.35-r1
OS: Gentoo Linux
URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
Submission from: (NULL) (59.61.17.143)
The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual, as I have
tested on both openSuSE 10.2 and gentoo Linux. Unfortunately I don't know what
it means but it seems to be pretty useful and enabled extended search filter
like given in RFC 3876. Probably it means "extend filter", I guess.
An example of -E as being discussed on openldap-software list:
when I search with "cn=foo*", and entry has multiple "cn" values, like
"cn=foo",
"cn=joe",
"cn=foobar",
"cn=foobarX",
"cn=bob",
"cn=nofoobar"
doing this search, it should only return
"cn=foo",
"cn=foobar",
"cn=foobarX",
$ ldapsearch -E mv="(cn=foo*)"
15 years, 11 months
