openldap-bugs July 2007

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

30 participants
126 discussions

Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by hyc＠symas.com 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com wrote: > Depends on the time you have I suppose. > > I presume this isn't the case in 2.4? > > If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4? Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release to refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP. Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining devel ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5 as-is. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by zhangweiwu＠realss.com 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

在 2007-07-01日的 10:11 +0200，Hallvard B Furuseth写道： > zhangweiwu(a)realss.com writes: > > The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual, > > It is now, since OpenLDAP 2.3.28 I think. Maybe you've got older > manuals than binaries, or multiple OpenLDAP installations. Yes you are right. 2.3.27 version on SuSE has this option missing in manual, but 2.3.30 on Gentoo Linux have this option in manual. My mistake on not checking carefully the newer version. Thanks for closing this issue.

1 0

Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by ghenry＠suretecsystems.com 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

<quote who="Hallvard B Furuseth"> > Gavin Henry writes: >><quote who="Pierangelo Masarati"> >>> In re23 slapo-rwm should not be used in conjunction with other >>> overlays; there is a number of reports about interoperability issues, >>> (...) >> That's strange though, as I merely followed the slapd-ldap(5) man page: >> (...) >> Maybe a man page patch is needed to stop others hitting this. > > I'll insert "OpenLDAP 2.3, rwm should not be used in conjunction with > other overlays." in slapo-rwm(5), slapd-ldap(5) and slapd-relay(5) > unless someone has a better idea. > > Or since Pierangelo followed up with > "it interacts poorly with other, more recent overlays." If you stop ^^ here, then you might as well use your first sentence. > should it be "...unless you know what you are doing" in the backend docs > and a more detailed instruction in slapo-rwm(5)? Depends on the time you have I suppose. I presume this isn't the case in 2.4? If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4? > > -- > Regards, > Hallvard >

1 0

Re: (ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

zhangweiwu(a)realss.com writes: > The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual, It is now, since OpenLDAP 2.3.28 I think. Maybe you've got older manuals than binaries, or multiple OpenLDAP installations. -- Regards, Hallvard

1 0

Re: Tranlucent Overlay (ITS#4889)
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

Gavin Henry writes: ><quote who="Pierangelo Masarati"> >> In re23 slapo-rwm should not be used in conjunction with other >> overlays; there is a number of reports about interoperability issues, >> (...) > That's strange though, as I merely followed the slapd-ldap(5) man page: > (...) > Maybe a man page patch is needed to stop others hitting this. I'll insert "OpenLDAP 2.3, rwm should not be used in conjunction with other overlays." in slapo-rwm(5), slapd-ldap(5) and slapd-relay(5) unless someone has a better idea. Or since Pierangelo followed up with "it interacts poorly with other, more recent overlays." should it be "...unless you know what you are doing" in the backend docs and a more detailed instruction in slapo-rwm(5)? -- Regards, Hallvard

1 0

(ITS#5034) ldapsearch -E not in manpage
by zhangweiwu＠realss.com 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

Full_Name: Zhang Weiwu Version: 2.3.35-r1 OS: Gentoo Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (59.61.17.143) The -E option in ldapsearch is not mentioned in ldapsearch manual, as I have tested on both openSuSE 10.2 and gentoo Linux. Unfortunately I don't know what it means but it seems to be pretty useful and enabled extended search filter like given in RFC 3876. Probably it means "extend filter", I guess. An example of -E as being discussed on openldap-software list: when I search with "cn=foo*", and entry has multiple "cn" values, like "cn=foo", "cn=joe", "cn=foobar", "cn=foobarX", "cn=bob", "cn=nofoobar" doing this search, it should only return "cn=foo", "cn=foobar", "cn=foobarX", $ ldapsearch -E mv="(cn=foo*)"

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs July 2007