Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, October 22, 2009 5:19 PM +0000 Bill MacAllister
<whm(a)stanford.edu> wrote:
> This is a problem for us because we expect to have a mixed 2.3/2.4 during
> the transistion to 2.4 on our production servers. The really nasty bit is
> that the only way I know for sure to fix this problem is to reload the
> slave. Is there an alterntive way?
Sanitize the data before it is written to the master.
And think about what degree of "sanitization" you're going for. In your
particular case, "c/o" is the common practice usage, not "c\o". I
guess "c\o"
is the product of a generation of people raised on Windows, who think "\" is
"slash" and don't realize that it is actually "back-slash", and
they've been
using it incorrectly all their lives...
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp.
http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/project/