>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com> schrieb am
11.01.2014 um 21:45 in
Nachricht <3E33AD8DB84666763FC3398E(a)[192.168.1.2]>:
--On Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:21 AM -0800 "Paul B.
Henson"
<henson(a)acm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:00:32PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
>> I then proceeded to run a test load on it (basically, I had a script I
>> put together when I added the memberof overlay that ripped through all
>> of our groups, removing and then re-adding all members). After this test
>> run, the use jumped to 1.9G:
>
> Hmm, well, I reran the same test script; there was no drastic jump in
> utilization, but it did increase from 479536 pages used to 492848, or
> 52M additional space used for storing the same content.
Yes, this is generally what I see when re-running massive changes. There
is a one time growth jump, and then it stabilizes.
It would be interesting to see the quotient of "size of mdb" / "size of the
database in slapcat format". OK, this ignores any indexes that will also consume some
space...
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration