I agree with that, I've been using delta-syncrepl here for a while and its
much more reliable than syncrepl IMO. I did not found any consistency issue
with the replication so far.
2011/4/27 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>
--On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:01 PM +0200 Michael Ströder <
> Couldn't this be the cause for delta-syncrepl to seem more reliable than
> normal syncrepl (without slapo-accesslog)?
I don't think so, because that is on the master, not on the replicas.
Replicas still get changes in the order they were written to the master
(supposedly anyhow. ;) ).
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration