I agree with that, I've been using delta-syncrepl here for a while and its much more reliable than syncrepl IMO. I did not found any consistency issue with the replication so far.


Matheus Morais

2011/4/27 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
--On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:01 PM +0200 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:


Couldn't this be the cause for delta-syncrepl to seem more reliable than
normal syncrepl (without slapo-accesslog)?

I don't think so, because that is on the master, not on the replicas. Replicas still get changes in the order they were written to the master (supposedly anyhow. ;) ).



Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration