Not to beat a dead horse and not to bash on Debian (personally Debian is the only distro I use), but to further help other people make a decision as to which version they should/may want to install: the slapd package included with Debian or the latest version from source:
The Debian community is fully aware of the numerous issues with their OpenLDAP package and acknowledges that it needs work, they have also been asking for help with OpenLDAP for some time (1878 days according to their "work-needing packages" list):
openldap (#512360), requested 1878 days ago Description: OpenLDAP server, libraries, and utilities Reverse Depends: 389-admin 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-dev 389-ds-base-libs 389-dsgw adcli alpine am-utils aolserver4-nsldap apache2-bin (200 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 163954
As the entry specifies bug #512360 in the BTS gives additional information about what work is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512360
Thanks,
Josh
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.comwrote:
--On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:00 AM +0100 Ulrich Windl < Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
Dieter Klünterdieter@dkluenter.de schrieb am 14.03.2014 um 21:50 in
Nachricht
20140314215009.33f39aee@pink.avci.de:
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:27:10 +0100 schrieb "Ulrich Windl" Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de:
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com schrieb am 13.03.2014 um > 19:03 in
Nachricht <34E9E18C6D0A7C6D92162635@[192.168.1.46]>:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:
Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
Plain syncrepl.
As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.
Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
A: >> One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
B: > Rubbish, have you ever seen a Debian or Ubuntu maintainer posting to
this mailing list?
C: > Actually there is no qualified Debian or Ubuntu maintainer.
What has A to do with B, and how can you conclude C from A or B?
B obviously has to do with A. A qualified maintainer would maintain some presence with the upstream project.
C you can conclude from years of interacting with the Debian project, like I have.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Architect - Server Zimbra, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration