openldap (#512360), requested 1878 days ago Description: OpenLDAP server, libraries, and utilities Reverse Depends: 389-admin 389-ds-base 389-ds-base-dev 389-ds-base-libs 389-dsgw adcli alpine am-utils aolserver4-nsldap apache2-bin (200 more omitted) Installations reported by Popcon: 163954
As the entry specifies bug #512360 in the BTS gives additional information about what work is needed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512360
B obviously has to do with A. A qualified maintainer would maintain some presence with the upstream project.--On Monday, March 17, 2014 9:00 AM +0100 Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
NachrichtDieter Klünter<email@example.com> schrieb am 14.03.2014 um 21:50 in
Am Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:27:10 +0100
schrieb "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <firstname.lastname@example.org> schrieb am 13.03.2014 um
>>> 19:03 in
> --On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 email@example.com
>> Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
>> Plain syncrepl.
>> As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next
>> couple of months. Right now I need to get through this problem
>> the best I can.
> Known issue with 2.4.31. Solution is to upgrade and stop using the
> crap shipped by Debian. The LTB project now has a deb repository
> for their builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.
A: >> One could also file a bug report for Debian, I guess.
B: > Rubbish, have you ever seen a Debian or Ubuntu maintainer posting to
this mailing list?
C: > Actually there is no qualified Debian or Ubuntu maintainer.
What has A to do with B, and how can you conclude C from A or B?
C you can conclude from years of interacting with the Debian project, like I have.
Architect - Server
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration