openldap-technical

openldap-technical@openldap.org

26 participants
9851 discussions

Transparent proxy to existing LDAP but with replacing specific attribute from another source
by Alexey D. Filimonov 28 Feb '25

28 Feb '25

Hi. A have Active Directory domain across 30+ domain controllers. In one single location, I have a server with corporate software that uses AD as normal ordinary LDAP with simple binds and it takes users. I want to add users their high quality photos, but I don't want them across all domain controllers in active directory. Can I build a proxy server with OpenLDAP that will proxy all requests to backend AD servers and return results, but for results it will replace one attribute, jpegPhoto, if it was requested, with some binary contents taken from elsewhere ?

2 1

olcDbMaxSize decrease possible?
by cyril＠stoll.info 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

Hi there For some reason I don't remember I set the olcDbMaxSize to 4 GB. Turns out that is way too large for our OpenLDAP servers. Both the admin guide and the slapd-mdb manpage state that "this setting may be changed upward". Unfortunately there is no mentioning of decreasing that size. On our servers the data.mdb and lock.mdb Files together are around 176 MB. I don't really expect a significant growth of our OpenLDAP Servers. So I guess that setting it to 1 GB or even just 500 MB would be more than enough for our needs in the coming years. So my question is, can I also decrease that size? Or should I just let it be at 4 GB even though we will never ever come close to that? Thanks a lot and best regards, Cyril

2 1

Querying a tree covered by multiple databases
by Norman Gray 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

Greetings. If I have a server which manages a tree split into two databases, one covering o=top, and one ou=sub,o=top, then a query against base o=top with subtree scope returns only objects within the first database, and not the second. Should I have expected that? (I didn't) [ This is a for-interest question. This isn't really a practical problem for me: I'm encountering it because I have a situation where I'm searching objects in ou=sub,o=top and in o=top, which would be on different servers in the real case, but which are in the same server as part of a test harness. Of course, I doubt it would be a good production design to have a tree split into multiple databases like this. ] That makes sense if the semantics of a search are that it searches a _database_, but it conflicts with the intuition that a search is of a _tree_, where I'd expect a search of o=top to implicitly include ou=sub,o=top as well. My problem is that I can't find where in the manual it tells me I should expect the former rather than the latter. What have I not read? Both ldapsearch(1) and ldap_search(3) discuss the scope in terms of sub_tree_, and don't mention databases (I wouldn't expect them to, since here a 'database' is an implementation detail of the LDAP server). Section 1.1 of TFM says 'A directory is a specialized database specifically designed for searching and browsing', but that's 'database' being used somewhat generically. Perhaps I should be looking at referrals? But the introduction of referrals in TFM suggest that these are a mechanism for referring clients to servers broadly 'elsewhere', and Sect. 5.3 documents olcReferral by saying that 'queries not local to one of the databases defined below will be referred to the LDAP server running on [another server]'. And queries to ou=sub,o=top _is_ 'local to one of the databases'. Best wishes, Norman -- Norman Gray : https://nxg.me.uk

2 2

How do I list existing indexes
by Richard Perini 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

I'm sure this question has been asked before, but my googling has failed to find an answer: How can I get a list of attribute indexes for our OpenLDAP instance? We're running version 2.4.57 (FreeBSD). Thanks in advance, -- Richard Perini Ramico Australia Pty Ltd Sydney, Australia rpp(a)ramico.com.au ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference, but in practice there is"

3 4

OpenLDAP 3-way multimaster oathHOTPCounter problem
by agrru01＠gmail.com 27 Feb '25

27 Feb '25

Hello! I am using a 3-way multimaster syncrepl setup with the slapo-otp module. My problem is that when authenticating with a user using HOTP, the attribute oathHOTPCounter only updates the value on the target ldap instance. This means the other two ldap instances do not get the updated HOTP-counter value and therefore will allow authentication using the same HOTP code. Interestingly enough, if I manually edit the oathHOTPCounter value it synchronizes with the other masters. Any idea what the problem could be?

2 1

A ldif for authentication
by Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh 24 Feb '25

24 Feb '25

Hello, I'm very happy with OpenLDAP. I have the following scenario: I need to have a back to support 1. Usernames 2. Groups 3. Passwords of usernames 4. password of groups And some CN Note: Not only I don't want to use /etc/passwd and local authentication, but also I need to virtual {user,account}. Would you please help me to generate an ldif to import to openldap? Yours, Mohsen

2 1

Debian Bookworm: Issues with stucking / hanging slapd process 2.5, while add / modify entries (master-master replication)
by linuxmail＠4lin.net 24 Feb '25

24 Feb '25

Hello, we fighting since upgrade from Buster to Bookworm with smaller and bigger issues on our OpenLDAP. We use WebADM as IDM (Rcdevs) and this is using OpenLDAP as backend. Since a long while on Bookworm, we have the issues, that slapd stucks on operations, like on adding entries. For example adding more than 1 CN entry to an existing OU. The only way to get all working is again, to stop slapd, but systemctl stop slapd doesn't work, you have to use kill -9 .. and that, pretty often. So, I hoped, to get it working again, I cloned the VMs; cutted the (normal) network and used a localhost bridge, so that both can see each others, without issues. Then I've created a backup (slapcat); deleted the db and slapd.d/cn=config ... and restored on both the DB. This part worked without issues .. but: ``` cat /home/foo/sudo_single.ldif dn: cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local objectclass: sudorole objectclass: top cn: jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02 sudorunasuser: ALL sudooption: !authenticate sudocommand: /bin/su sudohost: fra-dev-bookworm-02.example.local sudouser: jochoa(a)example.local ldapadd -ZZ -c -x -D 'cn=webadmin,ou=Accounts,dc=example,dc=local' -W -H ldap://fra-corp-auth-01.example.com:389 -f /home/foo/sudo_single.ldif -vv ldap_initialize( ldap://fra-corp-auth-01.example.com:389/??base ) Enter LDAP Password: add objectclass: sudorole top add cn: jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02 add sudorunasuser: ALL add sudooption: !authenticate add sudocommand: /bin/su add sudohost: fra-dev-bookworm-02.example.local add sudouser: jochoa(a)example.local adding new entry "cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local" ``` and then .. it just stucks, till I break with CTRL +C The same happens via ApacheDirectory or using WebADM Gui ... sometimes it works .. but often not. ```` eb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: activity on: Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: 22r Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: read active on 22 Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: epoll: listen=8 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: epoll: listen=9 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: epoll: listen=10 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_get(22) Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_get(22): got connid=1041 Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_read(22): checking for input on id=1041 Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: op tag 0x68, time 1740046822 Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: conn=1041 op=1 do_add Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: conn=1041 op=1 do_add: dn (cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local) Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local> Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local>, <cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local> Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: conn=1041 op=1 ADD dn="cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: => mdb_entry_get: ndn: "cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: => mdb_entry_get: oc: "(null)", at: "(null)" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: mdb_dn2entry("cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local") Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: => mdb_dn2id("cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local") Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: <= mdb_dn2id: get failed: MDB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30798) Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: => mdb_entry_get: cannot find entry: "cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: mdb_entry_get: rc=32 Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: ==> mdb_add: cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_required entry (cn=jochoa_fra_dev_bookworm_02,ou=user_rules,ou=sudoers,dc=example,dc=local), objectClass "sudoRole" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "objectClass" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "cn" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "sudoRunAsUser" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "sudoOption" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "sudoCommand" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "sudoHost" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "sudoUser" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: oc_check_allowed type "structuralObjectClass" Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: activity on: Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: Feb 20 11:20:22 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: daemon: epoll: listen=8 active_threads=0 tvp=zero ``` If I try to stop the slapd om ldap1: ``` Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: conn=1001 fd=20 closed (slapd shutdown) Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_closing: readying conn=1041 sd=22 for close Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_close: deferring conn=1041 sd=22 Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_closing: readying conn=1011 sd=23 for close Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: connection_close: deferring conn=1011 sd=23 Feb 20 11:23:10 fra-corp-auth-01 slapd[710]: slapd shutdown: waiting for 4 operations/tasks to finish ``` strace shows: ``` futex(0x7f3e9a9ff990, FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET|FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME, 720, NULL, FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY ``` So, if I stop all .. start slapd again .. all seems fine .. * ldap2 ``` Feb 20 11:49:32 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[686]: conn=1209 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search Feb 20 11:49:32 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[686]: conn=1209 op=2 syncprov_op_search: no change, skipping log replay Feb 20 11:49:32 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[686]: conn=1209 op=2 syncprov_op_search: nothing changed, finishing up initial search early Feb 20 11:49:32 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[686]: conn=1209 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= Feb 20 11:49:32 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[686]: conn=1209 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op ``` then I again try to use ldapadd .. and I see still: * ldap2 ``` ... Feb 20 11:54:35 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: =>do_syncrepl rid=002 Feb 20 11:54:36 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=8 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:36 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=9 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:36 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=10 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:36 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: start_refresh: rid=002 a refresh on rid=001 in progress, pausing Feb 20 11:54:37 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: =>do_syncrepl rid=002 Feb 20 11:54:38 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=8 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:38 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=9 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:38 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: daemon: epoll: listen=10 active_threads=0 tvp=zero Feb 20 11:54:38 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: start_refresh: rid=002 a refresh on rid=001 in progress, pausing Feb 20 11:54:39 fra-corp-auth-02 slapd[4696]: =>do_syncrepl rid=002 .... but .. a ldapsearch on ldap1 .. **still works** :-/ on ldap1 .. log is silent, except from my ldapsearch and ... I have to kill -9 slapd on ldap1 again and start .. I have no clue .. what else I can do ..... any hints ? cu denny

2 2

slapo-otp: manual page could be improved
by Windl, Ulrich 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

Hi! Reading the slapo-otp manual page, It's not quite clear to me how it works: * The tokens are stored in a separate entry, but does the manual page say what object type that entry has to be? I wonder why the token isn't stored directly within the user entry as tokens most likely are not shared. * Likewise "parameters" are stored in a separate entry; again what object type would those be? * Confusingly the manual talks about "attributes" next: Are those "parameters"? I mean: length and HMAC algorithm might be shared among entries, but counter and time-step cannot. A sample configuration would be really helpful, given that the only reference is "See also slapd-config(5)". Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

2 1

Migration from 2.4 to 2.5: problem with using "olcPPolicyDefault" in ACL duriung slapadd
by Windl, Ulrich 21 Feb '25

21 Feb '25

Hi! I'm about to migrate openLDAP 2.4 from SLES12 SP5 to openLDAP 2.5 from SLES15 SP6, following the rather terse https://www.openldap.org/doc/admin25/appendix-upgrading.html. I've removed the policy schema as advised from the LDIF export of cn=config, but now it seems that slapadd cannot use "olcPPolicyDefault" in an ACL: # slapadd -v -n0 -F /etc/openldap/slapd.d -S 1 -w -l 0.ldif added: "cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn=module{0},cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={0}core,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={1}cosine,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={2}inetorgperson,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={3}rfc2307bis,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={4}yast,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "cn={5}sudo,cn=schema,cn=config" (00000001) added: "olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config" (00000001) olcAccess: value #1: unknown attr "olcPPolicyDefault" in to clause. <access clause> ::= access to <what> [ by <who> [ <access> ] [ <control> ] ]+ <what> ::= * | dn[.<dnstyle>=<DN>] [filter=<filter>] [attrs=<attrspec>] <attrspec> ::= <attrname> [val[/<matchingRule>][.<attrstyle>]=<value>] | <attrlist> <attrlist> ::= <attr> [ , <attrlist> ] <attr> ::= <attrname> | @<objectClass> | !<objectClass> | entry | children <who> ::= [ * | anonymous | users | self | dn[.<dnstyle>]=<DN> ] [ realanonymous | realusers | realself | realdn[.<dnstyle>]=<DN> ] [dnattr=<attrname>] [realdnattr=<attrname>] [group[/<objectclass>[/<attrname>]][.<style>]=<group>] [peername[.<peernamestyle>]=<peer>] [sockname[.<style>]=<name>] [domain[.<domainstyle>]=<domain>] [sockurl[.<style>]=<url>] [ssf=<n>] [transport_ssf=<n>] [tls_ssf=<n>] [sasl_ssf=<n>] <style> ::= exact | regex | base(Object) <dnstyle> ::= base(Object) | one(level) | sub(tree) | children | exact | regex <attrstyle> ::= exact | regex | base(Object) | one(level) | sub(tree) | children <peernamestyle> ::= exact | regex | ip | ipv6 | path <domainstyle> ::= exact | regex | base(Object) | sub(tree) <access> ::= [[real]self]{<level>|<priv>} <level> ::= none|disclose|auth|compare|search|read|{write|add|delete}|manage <priv> ::= {=|+|-}{0|d|x|c|s|r|{w|a|z}|m}+ <control> ::= [ stop | continue | break ] slapadd: could not add entry dn="olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config" (line=908): ▒5=▒ Closing DB... (Also note the garbage in the error message that seems to appear for any slapadd error) As noted Openldap is SUSE's version (openldap2_5-2.5.18+31-150500.11.12.1.x86_64) they re-introduced in SLES15 SP5 (maybe due to failing to provide a working migration tool to 389-DS and a proper administration manual) So is it a bug that the attribute cannot be used in ACL, or is it a configuration error on my side? (line 908 is "dn: olcDatabase={0}config,cn=config") The actual line in question is like this: olcAccess: {1}to attrs=olcPPolicyDefault by dn.exact="uid=PP-Checker,ou=system,dc=domain,dc=org" read by * break Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

2 2

Change from mono to multivalued
by Frédéric Goudal 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

Hello, I may have to change some attributes from mono valued to multivalued on my production openldap I would like to know if I can do the change dynamically on the running ldap ? Most of my openldap are in 2.6.x version, but… I have one old in 2.4 (yes I know, it’s a very bad idea but too many problems to change it for me now) Thanks in advance Frederic — Frédéric Goudal Ingénieur Système, DSI Bordeaux-INP +33 556 84 23 11

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
986
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

openldap-technical