On 22. juli 2015 17:54, Howard Chu wrote:
> If we require C99 library features like this, then I
> think we should add a configure test for them. Strange
> breakage at runtime is rather worse than a failed build.
> (That's not the same as testing for a C99 compiler, since
> one can have a C99 compiler like gcc with a C90 library.)
The fewer configure tests we need, the better. Happy to replace %zu with %llu
and forget about it. It's not worth a fuss.
Right. Looks like it should be %ld and (long) though,
we don't use long long either except inside HAVE_LONG_LONG etc