On 22. juli 2015 17:54, Howard Chu wrote:

h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:

...

If we require C99 library features like this, then I think we should add a configure test for them. Strange breakage at runtime is rather worse than a failed build.

(That's not the same as testing for a C99 compiler, since one can have a C99 compiler like gcc with a C90 library.)

The fewer configure tests we need, the better. Happy to replace %zu with %llu and forget about it. It's not worth a fuss.

Right. Looks like it should be %ld and (long) though, we don't use long long either except inside HAVE_LONG_LONG etc and mdb.c