<quote who="ghenry@suretecsystems.com">

<quote who="h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no"> > hyc@symas.com writes: >> steve@stevenwills.com wrote: >>> The slapcat man page says in the Limitations section: >>> >>> In general, your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not >>> in >>> read-write mode) when you do this to ensure consistency of the >>> database. >>> (...) >> Given that back-ldbm has been deleted for 2.4, I guess we can just >> delete this sentence. > > It could produce garbage data with back-ldif, and with some foreign > database module. I think it should say it's safe with bdb (and null). > Could copy it to the slapd-bdb(5) too. (I don't suggest to make > slapcat(8) refer the user to that, since there is only one example > anyway.)

Obviously hdb too. Would it produce garbage on 2.4?

Do we want to do anything with this for .37?

...

-- Regards, Hallvard