--On August 25, 2007 7:34:22 AM +0000 ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
>> ConfigReply is declared in slapd/config.h; could it be another,
>> system-related config.h is present in an earlier include path?
>> Even though, I see in the above cc command-line -I .. is present...
> Personally, I think have -I., -I.., etc. is really bad. This causes
> # include "config.h"
> # include <config.h>
> to be equivalent. However, there could be both a local config.h and a
> config.h somewhere in the system include directory.
> I would be better if slapd/config.h was included here by:
> # include "../config.h"
> and -I.. not be added to the include path. It possible -I.. is causing
> a system header to be eclipsed by the local header.
-I.. is needed to include slap.h, proto-slap.h, ...
I'd rather rename config.h, which is quite generic, into slapconf.h or so.
In the name of getting 2.4.5 released, I've updated to Kurt's suggestion
until such a time as this can be acted upon otherwise.
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration