Kurt Zeilenga wrote: >> ConfigReply is declared in slapd/config.h; could it be another, >> system-related config.h is present in an earlier include path? >> >> Even though, I see in the above cc command-line -I .. is present... > > Personally, I think have -I., -I.., etc. is really bad. This causes > # include "config.h" > and > # include <config.h> > > to be equivalent. However, there could be both a local config.h and a > config.h somewhere in the system include directory. > > I would be better if slapd/config.h was included here by: > # include "../config.h" > > and -I.. not be added to the include path. It possible -I.. is causing > a system header to be eclipsed by the local header. -I.. is needed to include slap.h, proto-slap.h, ... I'd rather rename config.h, which is quite generic, into slapconf.h or so.