raphael.ouazana@linagora.com wrote:

Le Lun 10 septembre 2007 00:12, Pierangelo Masarati a écrit :

...

raphael.ouazana@linagora.com wrote:

...

Do you think this patch has any chance to be accepted for future 2.4?

Applied (with minor changes) to HEAD, please test.

It seems OK with HEAD, but only if I revert this patch: http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/sets.c.diff?r1=1.28.2...

With this patch, I get a segfault.

I think that's somehow related to ITS#4873, which I should definitely take time to solve. Unfortunately, with the proposed patch I see a leak, and I couldn't find time to track it down.

...

And, could you document it on the FAQ, please?

Done: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1133.html. Does it seems good for you ?

...

One improvement that could be applied is to allow numbers larger than 9...

As far as I know, there is no such limitation...

Then I probably misinterpreted that bit of parsing.

p.

Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------