> > I just did the same on my x86_64 dual core. Result: 1 failure and 99 > passes. > Might be that this bug is better reproducable on a single core machine. > But at > least I was able to reproduce it now. I can run the same command above on a x86_64 dual core on Monday, as I'm away on business the rest of the week. >> Very strange.... > > I have fixed a very similar issue recently (at least I thought I fixed > it :| ). I'll take a closer look tomorrow.