Am 03.01.2017 um 20:12 schrieb Howard Chu:
sca@andreasschulze.de wrote:
Am 28.11.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I have a few additional comments: ...
I updated the patch as suggested: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/andreas-schulze-161204.patch
+/* REVIEW: CRYPTO_num_locks is defined as "(1)" openssl-1.1.0 */ +static ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_t tlso_mutexes[CRYPTO_num_locks()];
This is not acceptable. The fact that the macro is defined as a function macro implies that it may be turned into a genuine function at some point in the future. Either we get a commitment from the OpenSSL developers that this macro will always be a constant, or the code must change to dynamically allocate the mutexes array.
@@ -882,6 +924,9 @@ static BIO_METHOD tlso_bio_method = tlso_bio_create, tlso_bio_destroy }; +#else +static BIO_METHOD *tlso_bio_method = NULL; +#endif
static int tlso_sb_setup( Sockbuf_IO_Desc *sbiod, void *arg ) @@ -898,8 +943,29 @@ tlso_sb_setup( Sockbuf_IO_Desc *sbiod, void *arg )
p->session = arg; p->sbiod = sbiod;
+#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x10100000L bio = BIO_new( &tlso_bio_method ); bio->ptr = (void *)p; +#else
- if ( tlso_bio_method == NULL ) {
tlso_bio_method = BIO_meth_new(( 100 | 0x400 ), "sockbuf glue");
if ( tlso_bio_method == NULL
|| !BIO_meth_set_write(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_write)
|| !BIO_meth_set_read(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_read)
|| !BIO_meth_set_puts(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_puts)
|| !BIO_meth_set_gets(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_gets)
|| !BIO_meth_set_ctrl(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_ctrl)
|| !BIO_meth_set_create(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_create)
|| !BIO_meth_set_destroy(tlso_bio_method, tlso_bio_destroy)) {
return -1;
}
- }
- bio = BIO_new(tlso_bio_method);
- if ( bio == NULL ) {
return -1;
- }
- BIO_set_data(bio, (void *)p);
+#endif
This is no good, the tlso_bio_method must be initialized once and only once. The structure can be referenced simultaneously from multiple threads, and initing on each use will be a performance hit as well as a waste of memory.
Hello Howard,
looks like you're much more familiar with open[ssl|ldap] insides. My intension was to show a way to build openldap with openssl-1.1.0. I'm aware that is not ideal and you prove that now. Thanks. But I cannot contribute better code. Sorry.
Andreas