------=_Part_45311_2874873.1175811229646 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/3/07, Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:

The log says that ITS#4638 was already fixed in 2.3.32. Why are you still using that particular patch, given that an alternate solution is already present in the release?

I can't replicate ITS#4638 under 2.3.32, so you can mark ITS#4907 resolved (I removed the bad patch).

I also see that in RE23 we had one more patch to fix some interaction

between slapo-rwm and back-meta for filter processing. I suggest you test against the current RE23 code. I expect to push 2.3.35 out pretty soon.

Thank you.

Sean

------=_Part_45311_2874873.1175811229646 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

<span class="gmail_quote">On 4/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Howard Chu</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:hyc@symas.com">hyc@symas.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><br><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> The log says that ITS#4638 was already fixed in 2.3.32. Why are you<br>still using that particular patch, given that an alternate solution is<br>already present in the release?</blockquote><div><br>I can&#39;t replicate ITS#4638 under 2.3.32, so you can mark ITS#4907 resolved (I removed the bad patch).<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I also see that in RE23 we had one more patch to fix some interaction <br>between slapo-rwm and back-meta for filter processing. I suggest you<br>test against the current RE23 code. I expect to push 2.3.35 out pretty soon.</blockquote><div><br>Thank you. <br></div><br></div>Sean

------=_Part_45311_2874873.1175811229646--