Hello Quanah,

only for information, were you able to reproduce this issue?

Thanks for the feedback

2015-11-02 10:57 GMT+01:00 Maurizio Lattuada maurizio.lattuada@gmail.com:

Hello Quanah,

unfortunately I cannot send here the complete and precise schema, is used by our internal proprietary applications. Anyway, it can be described as:

• dc=directory

** ou=person ** ou=organization ** ou=relationship

"ou=person" has "objectClass=inetOrgPerson" and an identifier (yeah, clearly other fields like first name, last name, isActive, phone number, address and so on) "ou=organization" has an identifier plus the other "common" fields (name, address...) "ou=relationship" has "objectClass=groupOfNames" and is used to describe:

• relationships between persons and organizations ("a person belongs

to one or more organization", that is an "organization has these persons as members")

• relationships between organizations (e.g. "org_1_a is a

sub-organization of the main organization org_1", that is "org_1 has org_1_a as member").

So, considering the schema I described in my previous email:

Test-bench_application --> spring_http_invoker --> Server_side_app ---> data_for_db_2 ---> LDAP ---> data_from_db_2 ---> App_in_syncprov_with_ldap

the "Server_side_app" creates in sequence:

• one unique organization (let me call it simply "org_p", it has no

sub-organization)

• about 19500 persons by doing a loop as:

** create one person ** create the related entry in "ou=relationship" to describe "person x belongs to org_p"

Meanwhile this procedure is done, the synchronization via syncprov is running to keep in sync the LDAP database 2 and "App_in_syncprov_with_ldap".

Hope it helps.

thanks for the feedback.

2015-10-30 19:06 GMT+01:00 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com:

...

--On Friday, October 30, 2015 10:35 AM +0100 Maurizio Lattuada maurizio.lattuada@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hello Quanah,

I added the syncprov overlay to the 1st database, but is neither used by our application (rather than by another off-the-shelf application) nor replicated as is for the 2nd database. For your 2nd request, unfortunately I'm not able to test it, since between the LDAP and my test-bench application there is another server side application:

Ok. Is it possible to provide the custom schema you are using, and an example of a user entry you are loading, so I can template it? I'd like to see if I can reproduce the problem.

Thanks.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount Platform Architect Zimbra, Inc.

---

Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

-- Maurizio Lattuada