Hi Ando. I've tested on RHEL 4/5 x86 and all seems good. I'll test on =
Windows in a little while.
On May 17, 2010, at 6:27 PM, masarati(a)aero.polimi.it wrote:
> Indeed, syncprov_operational() is right: it duplicates the entry only =
> contextCSN is already present in the entry, and thus may need to
> updated. What's wrong is back-bdb, which gives up when the entry =
> have e_private set appropriately, while it could do more to find
> the entry's subordinates. This may explain why in some cases
> attribute is present. This occurs whenever contextCSN is not already
> present in the entry. I'm preparing a fix for back-bdb.
Fixed in HEAD; please test. Thanks, p.