Hi Ando. I've tested on RHEL 4/5 x86 and all seems good. I'll test on = Windows in a little while.

Thanks!

-Matt

On May 17, 2010, at 6:27 PM, masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:

=20

...

Indeed, syncprov_operational() is right: it duplicates the entry only =

if

...

contextCSN is already present in the entry, and thus may need to be updated. What's wrong is back-bdb, which gives up when the entry =

does not

...

have e_private set appropriately, while it could do more to find out =

about

...

the entry's subordinates. This may explain why in some cases the attribute is present. This occurs whenever contextCSN is not already present in the entry. I'm preparing a fix for back-bdb.

=20 Fixed in HEAD; please test. Thanks, p. =20