--On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:41 AM +0000 jsynacek@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Str?der wrote:
Jan Synacek wrote:
On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael@stroeder.com wrote:
It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for ITS#7168.
This works for me:
slapd.ldif: ... dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcConstraintConfig olcOverlay: constraint olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 ...
From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint.
Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or URL-based constraints.
The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-constraint quite heavily.
Ciao, Michael.
I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me.
Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the patch. Thank you.
Hi Michael,
Have you had any luck in providing a configuration that doesn't work to Jan, so this can be resolved?
Thanks, Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration