ondra(a)mistotebe.net wrote: > The issue is actually allowing existing controls to be used with newly > registered exops, since the only way to declare the compatibility would > be by re-registering the control. Problem there is that built-in > controls have everything static to controls.c, so it's not even possible > to do that. > > A solution would be to add another piece of API that receives a pair of > (control OID, exop OID), finds the control and adds the OID to the > sc_extendedops(bv) lists. > > Going to do just that (register_control_exop() a decent name?).