Howard Chu wrote:
Of course, you've also been around the Project for pretty much
existence, and ought to know by now what information is needed in a useful bug
I didn't expect having to provide a complete working setup for each small
issue. MMR setup with slapo-accesslog attached to each provider already says
it all. I also didn't expect to read non-sense about the accesslog DB itself
being replicated (see follow-up 1).
Demanding more and more information for almost trivial things pretty much
reminds me of bad support for commercial products.
Now we'll see if this ITS will ever turn out something useful...