--94eb2c075988d198060559c39077 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
aleksey.kamensky@gmail.com wrote:
Full_Name: Alexey Kamenskiy Version: 2.4.45 OS: CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (220.248.35.50)
Setting up fresh 2.4.45 with MDB noticed that MDB does allow to create multiple databases in the same directory (noticed by mistake of creating multiple MDBs in default /var/lib/ldap).
It shows no error and no any warning. After this ALL of the databases are writeable and readable. On reading the results returned for all 3 databases (and not for the DIT specified in ldapsearch -b).
None of the other backends protect from this either. (Nor can they, since any individual backend doesn't know anything about any other backend's configuration.) Not a bug.
You are right that other backends (I am talking here hdb/bdb) do not explicitly check for this, but those backends will produce error on attempt to read/write into database created in the directory where DB already exists. LMDB just works in this case and returns bad results if try to read.
Even if not intentionally those errors serve as a reminder that one should not create two DBs in same directory.
And on the other hand saying "not an issue because no one else does it this way" is not a good approach IMO as it only stimulates copying and does not help those offering improvements.
--94eb2c075988d198060559c39077 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Howard Chu <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a hr= ef=3D"mailto:hyc@symas.com" target=3D"_blank">hyc@symas.com</a>></span> = wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bord= er-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><a href=3D"mailto:aleksey.kamensky= @gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">aleksey.kamensky@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Full_Name: Alexey Kamenskiy<br> Version: 2.4.45<br> OS: CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)<br> URL: <a href=3D"ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target= =3D"_blank">ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incomin<wbr>g/</a><br> Submission from: (NULL) <a href=3D"tel:%28220.248.35.50" value=3D"+12202483= 550" target=3D"_blank">(220.248.35.50</a>)<br> <br> <br> Setting up fresh 2.4.45 with MDB noticed that MDB does allow to create mult= iple<br> databases in the same directory (noticed by mistake of creating multiple MD= Bs in<br> default /var/lib/ldap).<br> <br> It shows no error and no any warning. After this ALL of the databases are<b= r> writeable and readable. On reading the results returned for all 3 databases= (and<br> not for the DIT specified in ldapsearch -b).<br> </blockquote> <br> None of the other backends protect from this either. (Nor can they, since a= ny individual backend doesn't know anything about any other backend'= ;s configuration.) Not a bug.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>You are right= that other backends (I am talking here hdb/bdb) do not explicitly check fo= r this, but those backends will produce error on attempt to read/write into= database created in the directory where DB already exists. LMDB just works= in this case and returns bad results if try to read.</div><div><br></div><= div>Even if not intentionally those errors serve as a reminder that one sho= uld not create two DBs in same directory.</div><div><br></div><div>And on t= he other hand saying "not an issue because no one else does it this wa= y" is not a good approach IMO as it only stimulates copying and does n= ot help those offering improvements.</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></di= v>
--94eb2c075988d198060559c39077--
-
aleksey.kamensky＠gmail.com