--=-Qa9s282ZNKloqhE3QHt5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:40 +0200, Michael Str=C3=B6der wrote:
abartlet(a)samba.org wrote:
> Samba4 always uses SASL credentials these days (trying to avoid simple
> binds).
=20
libsasldb2.so is not required for a SASL bind with password-based
mechanism. You can store the passwords in attribute userPassword (in
clear-text). So the security consideration is more about password
storage than SASL vs. simple bind on the wire.
Which we already use. Regardless, Howard's great detective work shows
it still gets in the way.=20
> Perhaps it's time to investigate EXTERNAL
=20
That would be good anyway since in Samba4 the result of standard
provision is LDAPI access anyway. So you could directly map the Unix
user smbd is running as (root?) with authz-regexp to directory user
samba-admin. Well, we already discussed that.. ;-)
We did. =20
Andrew Bartlett
--=20
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
http://redhat.com
--=-Qa9s282ZNKloqhE3QHt5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBKHJj0z4A8Wyi0NrsRAqkfAJ4jsghUdEiUTnOHsmG2Bg9njDe6agCeN4hF
aNRmEnt5qtFNRw7WtnaXqto=
=midd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Qa9s282ZNKloqhE3QHt5--