--=-I6d9E5fOqbwKcJhhvz+z Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:22 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
Full_Name: Andrew Bartlett Version: CVS HEAD OS: Fedora 9 URL: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/200803/msg00101.h=
Submission from: (NULL) (18.104.22.168)
For Samba4, I need a few things, detailed in the attached URL.
=20 The above message thread had some unanswered questions. We may need to ha=
each point listed out again. =20
This ITS is for internal transactions and validation - the ability to h=
openldap overlay roll back all the changes so far, because a preconditi=
on is not
=20 I think this one is understood, OK. Just a matter of getting the time to =
I need the memberOf and refint modules to ensure that no dangling links=
exist, even over subtree renames and invalid modifies, and that a trans=
ensures this is always the case.
=20 I think the proper use of memberOf still needs to be addressed. E.g., it'=
generally a bad idea to search for (memberOf=3Dfoo) when you can simply=20 enumerate the members inside the "foo" entry. If you give us precise exam=
of the searches and modifications that you'll be using, we may be able to=
narrow the scope of this work.
I'll be passing on any search that a windows client makes, and trying to return the same result a windows server would return. Bad ideas still have to be implemented in my world :-(
This needs to occur even between databases on the server, but I won't a=
it occur outside the known trees.
=20 It's already possible for operations in one database to reference entries=
different database, so that aspect of validation should be fine. However,=
noted before, "validation" is generally bogus to begin with. In particula=
how do you create entries with circular references? If you disallow refer=
to nonexistent entries, you can't set the references until after all of t=
entries have been created. This means that you cannot backup a database t=
has these references and then later reload it in a single pass.
An interesting point, but I need to match the windows runtime behaviour.=20
--=-I6d9E5fOqbwKcJhhvz+z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part