1:41 a.m.
Good moring List,
I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
solved new release of openldap?
Thanks very much for any kind of response.
Best regards
--
Olivier GERMAIN
Email : olivier.germain(a)kabira.fr
10:57 a.m.
<quote who="Olivier Germain">
Good moring List,
I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
solved new release of openldap?
Thanks very much for any kind of response.
Best regards
Hi,
You are aware ldap_init is deprecated in favour of ldap_initialize ?
Please join the list and e-mail openldap-software or
openldap-technical(a)openldap.org for user support.
Thanks,
Gavin.
--
Olivier GERMAIN
Email : olivier.germain(a)kabira.fr
11:07 a.m.
Olivier Germain wrote:
Good moring List,
I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
solved new release of openldap?
See <http://www.openldap.org/its?findid=4168> (read the whole story).
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
1:50 a.m.
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 21:07:16 Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Olivier Germain wrote:
> Good moring List,
>
> I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
> I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
> LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
> this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
> solved new release of openldap?
See <http://www.openldap.org/its?findid=4168> (read the whole story).
A compile-time warning or error would really help everyone ...
2:03 a.m.
Buchan Milne wrote:
On Tuesday 26 February 2008 21:07:16 Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Olivier Germain wrote:
>> Good moring List,
>>
>> I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
>> I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
>> LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
>> this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
>> solved new release of openldap?
> See <http://www.openldap.org/its?findid=4168> (read the whole story).
A compile-time warning or error would really help everyone ...
It's already there: with gcc, without any special flag, you get a
"assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast" if you use
ldap_init(3) and assign the result to a LDAP*; with -Wall you also get
"warning: implicit declaration of function `ldap_init'". Of course,
then, developers should take care of compile warnings... I don't know
what we could do more, other than removing those functions from libldap.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
3:31 a.m.
On Thursday 28 February 2008 12:03:58 Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 21:07:16 Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>> Olivier Germain wrote:
>>> Good moring List,
>>>
>>> I am using the following openldap release openldap/2.3.36_64.
>>> I am experiencing a signal 6 in the ldap_init during coonection to my
>>> LDAP server. I would like to know if someone of you has already got
>>> this problem. If yes could it be possible to know how this has been
>>> solved new release of openldap?
>>
>> See <http://www.openldap.org/its?findid=4168> (read the whole story).
>
> A compile-time warning or error would really help everyone ...
It's already there: with gcc, without any special flag, you get a
"assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast" if you use
ldap_init(3) and assign the result to a LDAP*; with -Wall you also get
"warning: implicit declaration of function `ldap_init'". Of course,
then, developers should take care of compile warnings... I don't know
what we could do more, other than removing those functions from libldap.
Use function attributes to deprecate the function, which I think would result
in a compilation warning with a suitable warning? If it's portable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.3/gcc/Function-Attributes.html#Func...
I had found some more docs on how to use it (on a KDE site) to result in an
error instead of a warning, but I can't find it now.
I was caught by this ... as I had very little time to upgrade from 2.2 to 2.3
on Mandriva (before version freeze), and rebuild all packages, and test
them ... and this didn't turn out well for some software with optional
run-time LDAP support (e.g. samba) on x86_64 (where x86 worked fine ...) as I
had limited access to x86_64 hardware (e.g. no root access). An error would
have allowed me to workaround it trivially, instead of waiting for
compile/upload/wait for mirror/test cycles.
If it's known that software using the deprecated functions can segfault, IMHO
it would be much better if (with typical default compiler options)
compilation failed, than succeeded.
Regards,
Buchan
5509
days inactive
5511
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Buchan Milne -
Gavin Henry -
Olivier Germain -
Pierangelo Masarati