<quote who="Howard Chu">

ghenry@suretecsystems.com wrote:

...

Depends on the time you have I suppose.

I presume this isn't the case in 2.4?

If so, maybe we should use your first sentence and refer them to 2.4?

Referring people to 2.4 really isn't nice unless we have an actual release to refer them to. Which is another reason we need to get a 2.4 beta out ASAP.

True. Also, when I raised this ticket I wasn't part of the team, so I can take on the man page fix if Hallvard doesn't have time.

Since it looks like no activity has occurred on closing out the remaining devel ITSs perhaps we should just freeze the current tree and roll out 2.4.5 as-is.

I think that would peak users interest again too.

-- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/