Full_Name: Version: 2.4.32 OS: Ubuntu 10, Debian Squeeze URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (130.233.152.136)

olcExtraAttrs does not seem to work with the rwm overlay (like in ITS#6513). With the rwm overlay present, ACIs are not evaluated when requesting a specific attribute, regardless of whether olcExtraAttrs is specified or not. In order to apply the ACI, you can pass the ACI attribute name in the search. I'm providing a configuration file that can be used to reproduce the problem as well as some search examples to demonstrate the issue.

----Configuration file----

dn: cn=config objectClass: olcGlobal cn: config olcPidFile: /usr/local/var/run/slapd.pid olcArgsFile: /usr/local/var/run/slapd.args #olcLogLevel: -1 olcToolThreads: 1

dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcFrontendConfig olcDatabase: {-1}frontend olcAccess: {0}to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by * break olcAccess: {1}to dn.base="" by * read olcAccess: {2}to dn.base="cn=subschema" by * read olcRequires: authc

dn: olcDatabase=config,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig olcDatabase: config olcAccess: to * by dn.exact=gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth manage by * break

dn: cn=schema,cn=config objectClass: olcSchemaConfig cn: schema

include: file:///usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/core.ldif

dn: cn=module,cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module olcModuleload: back_hdb olcModuleLoad: rwm

dn: olcOverlay=rwm,olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcRwmConfig olcOverlay: rwm

dn: olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcHdbConfig olcDatabase: hdb olcSuffix: dc=example,dc=com olcDbDirectory: /var/lib/ldap olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com olcRootPW: pass olcDbConfig: set_cachesize 0 2097152 0 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_objects 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_locks 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_lockers 1500 olcExtraAttrs: OpenLDAPaci olcAccess: to attrs=userpassword by anonymous auth olcAccess: to dn.base="dc=example,dc=com" by * search olcAccess: to * by self manage by dynacl/aci=OpenLDAPaci manage

----Note----

To disable the rwm overlay, comment the following 4 lines in the config:

dn: olcOverlay=rwm,olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcRwmConfig olcOverlay: rwm

----Test data----

dn: dc=example,dc=com objectClass: dcObject objectClass: top objectClass: organization dc: example o: example

dn: cn=a,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: a sn: a userPassword: pass

dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b userPassword: pass OpenLDAPaci: 1#entry#grant;r,s,c;[all]#access-id#cn=a,dc=example,dc=com

----Search examples----

Without rwm, requesting the whole object (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com

# b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

Without rwm, requesting an attribute (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn

# b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn: b

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

With rwm, requesting the whole object (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com

# b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: person cn: b sn: b

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

With rwm, requesting an attribute (notice the object is not returned here): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn

# numResponses: 1

With rwm, requesting an attribute and openldapaci (works as expected): ldapsearch -x -D cn=a,dc=example,dc=com -w pass -b cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn openldapaci

# b, example.com dn: cn=b,dc=example,dc=com sn: b OpenLDAPaci: 1#entry#grant;r,s,c;[all]#access-id#cn=a,dc=example,dc=com

# numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1

( Taken from my post on the openldap-technical mailing list: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201210/msg00104.html )