Den 05. aug. 2015 18:38, skrev hyc@symas.com:

clem.oudot@gmail.com wrote:

...

Seems other LDAP servers have choosen 'etime' (see http://ludopoitou.com/2015/02/24/about-auditing-ldap-operations/). Why not try to use the same word?

etime is fine with me. The other problem here is that it's counting duration from when slapd received the request (which is fine) but usually the op gets queued immediately after. For this etime to be useful we need to know both the amount of time spent queued, and the amount of time spent actually executing. qtime and etime?

It's total time which is interesting when looking for hot spots which need attention. So I suggest that plus either one of the others, or percentage of the total spent doing one of the others.