ando(a)sys-net.it wrote:
What would make things totally different is the persistence of a
problem
in 2.3 and 2.4. But the very existence of a problem has to be proven
yet. If you look at my analysis with dntest, you'll see that your DN
I confirm that using the schema extracted from
<ldap://cclcgtopbdii01.in2p3.fr:2170/>, 2.3/2.4 slapdn can successfully
handle the offending DN:
$ slapdn \
'GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO=swetest/GROUP=/swetest/ROLE=swadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,mds-vo-name=UPorto,mds-vo-name=local,o=grid'
DN:
<GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO=swetest/GROUP=/swetest/ROLE=swadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,mds-vo-name=UPorto,mds-vo-name=local,o=grid>
check succeeded
normalized:
<GlueVOViewLocalID=/vo\3Dswetest/group\3D/swetest/role\3Dswadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,Mds-Vo-name=uporto,Mds-Vo-name=local,o=grid>
pretty:
<GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO\3Dswetest/GROUP\3D/swetest/ROLE\3Dswadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,Mds-Vo-name=UPorto,Mds-Vo-name=local,o=grid>
I'd consider this ITS closed.
p.
Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
OpenLDAP Core Team
SysNet s.r.l.
via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
---------------------------------------
Office: +39 02 23998309
Mobile: +39 333 4963172
Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it
---------------------------------------