ando@sys-net.it wrote:

What would make things totally different is the persistence of a problem in 2.3 and 2.4. But the very existence of a problem has to be proven yet. If you look at my analysis with dntest, you'll see that your DN

I confirm that using the schema extracted from ldap://cclcgtopbdii01.in2p3.fr:2170/, 2.3/2.4 slapdn can successfully handle the offending DN:

$ slapdn \ 'GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO=swetest/GROUP=/swetest/ROLE=swadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,mds-vo-name=UPorto,mds-vo-name=local,o=grid' DN: <GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO=swetest/GROUP=/swetest/ROLE=swadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,mds-vo-name=UPorto,mds-vo-name=local,o=grid> check succeeded normalized: <GlueVOViewLocalID=/vo\3Dswetest/group\3D/swetest/role\3Dswadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,Mds-Vo-name=uporto,Mds-Vo-name=local,o=grid> pretty: <GlueVOViewLocalID=/VO\3Dswetest/GROUP\3D/swetest/ROLE\3Dswadmin,GlueCEUniqueID=grid001.fc.up.pt:2119/jobmanager-lcgsge-swetest,Mds-Vo-name=UPorto,Mds-Vo-name=local,o=grid>

I'd consider this ITS closed.

p.

Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------