Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
michael@stroeder.com writes:
hyc@symas.com wrote:
Who benefits from this feature?
An admin copying&pasting a schema from an standard document which uses this format. I'm currently looking at such a document with ~500 occurences of OIDs used in declarations instead of NAMEs.
Which one? It's not RFC 4512 format. RFC 4512 uses ';' for comments _about_ the syntax of schema elements, not _in_ their syntax.
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-dally-acp133-and-ldap/
Not for my professional work. I was just looking for really complex schemas for testing web2ldap.
Ciao, Michael.