Kurt@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
Yes, it has long been our practice not to publish schema elements which = are not yet well standardized. This would include any element which = carries a OpenLDAP.666 OID.
The idea being that use of such attributes should be limited to early = adopters and such.
Sorry, but this practice is inconsequent. The attributes are returned in LDAP responses and therefore a client should be able to look up the attribute type description in the schema e.g. to determine the syntax.
Some of the OIDs are now with .666 for years. Each time this topic is raised nothing happens...
Ciao, Michael.