24 Feb
2015
24 Feb
'15
12:11 a.m.
2015-02-11 18:33 GMT+01:00 h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no:
On 11. feb. 2015 12:38, Michael Str=C3=B6der wrote:
h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
Cool feture, but please use fewer characteres in the already bloated log. How about "time=3D<integer>us" or even omit the "us"?
+1
But 'time' sounds a bit general. How about 'tdu' or even 'td' as abbreviation for "time duration"?
I don't think so. You can't see from that what it means unless you already know, so you have to look it up just to see if you're interested. 'time' you can decide to look up if you are interested.
Seems other LDAP servers have choosen 'etime' (see http://ludopoitou.com/2015/02/24/about-auditing-ldap-operations/). Why not try to use the same word?
Cl=C3=A9ment OUDOT.