On Aug 21, 2008, at 9:57 AM, michael@stroeder.com wrote:
Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
michael@stroeder.com writes:
hyc@symas.com wrote:
Who benefits from this feature?
An admin copying&pasting a schema from an standard document which uses this format. I'm currently looking at such a document with ~500 occurences of OIDs used in declarations instead of NAMEs.
Which one? It's not RFC 4512 format. RFC 4512 uses ';' for comments _about_ the syntax of schema elements, not _in_ their syntax.
There is a lot of crap in I-Ds, and even some crap in RFCs.
-- Kurt