hyc@symas.com writes:
You might consider suggesting to PADL that they contribute pam/nss_ldap to the OpenLDAP Project, if you want us to take an active role in solving this. Until then, the discussion just doesn't belong here on the OpenLDAP ITS. I'll note that I've described the solution Symas uses in our commercial distribution of pam/nss-ldap on the pam/nss-ldap mailing lists in the past. Our package has none of these issues.
Hint: since dynamic linker dependencies are causing the conflict, the solution is not to rely on the dynamic linker. In this particular case, using the dynamic linker introduces a security vulnerability anyway.
Understood. Thank you very much for the help that you've provided. We'll try to find a solution that won't make you hate us. :)