7 Feb
2008
7 Feb
'08
5:52 a.m.
rra@stanford.edu writes:
Steve had an ugly hack to work around this by linking the meta backend against the bdb backend. Doing that isn't the ugly part -- that's actually formally correct and really is what libtool should be doing in the first place. The ugly part is that libtool *really* doesn't like linking against something that doesn't start with lib*.
Sorry, I didn't double-check the original report and got this confused. I believe it's back-ldap that back-meta has a dependency on, not back-bdb.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/