9 Apr
2008
9 Apr
'08
8:01 a.m.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
Does this help? From my fiddling with ITS#5340 (REP_ENTRY_MODIFIABLE). I do not understand syncprov's handling of REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE though. (For one thing it seems to assume that REP_ENTRY_MUSTRELEASE is set if and only if rs.sr_entry->e_private != NULL. Which is possibly true with back-bdb but seems a shaky assumption in general.)
I have found out how to reliably reproduce this bug in our master server, and it definitely involves syncprov. I'm now working on reproducing it in a minimalistic test configuration, I'll try your patch there and report back.
Rein