On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Domagoj Babic wrote:
calysto v1.5 on openldap_v2.4.4alpha: ??/20
FYI, 2.4.4 is old code.
Are you interested in having the newer one checked?
I'm generally interested in new reports of actual or potential bugs in OpenLDAP Software. I'm generally uninterested in redundant reports of actual or potential bugs, or redundant reports of non-bugs.
Others, of course, might find more of your report interesting than I do. And I might even find one or two of the cases more interesting if they were get pulled from the weeds of non-bugs. I simply don't have time/energy to pull them from the weeds myself.
For instance, there is one report about which I'm not 100% certain, and no one has even looked at reports carefully enough to figure that out.
Aside from the fact your message was only distributed to the list hours ago, and you already have two responses to your message, it seems like it getting pretty good attention to me. I cannot imagine any message discussing such issues to have gained much more attention in a shorter period of time.
That said, as I noted above, I might be find one or two cases more interesting if they were pulled from the weeds. If you have some urgent need to have one or two examined soon, I suggest you do the pulling.
-- Kurt