1 Sep
2016
1 Sep
'16
1:50 a.m.
--On Thursday, September 01, 2016 8:58 AM +0000 quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
In looking at the LDAP accesslog, what I see is that what should have been a modRDN op was stored in the accesslog as a MOD op (the one I noted before). This seems particularly bizarre, because ldap01 should have rejected this change as well. It appears we may have a problem where the accesslog DB is updated, but then the change got rejected by the unique overlay.
Ok, actually the server (ldap01) accepted the change (renamed the entry). Looking at the database, it was correctly done as a MODRDN to ldap01, but /written/ as a MOD to accesslog?!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount