https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8753
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
RE26:
• 394f6ad5
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-02-18T23:18:31+00:00
ITS#8753 Document LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PEERKEY_HASH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8753
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• a2a2ebba
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-02-14T20:32:29+00:00
ITS#8753 Document LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_PEERKEY_HASH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9797
Issue ID: 9797
Summary: userPrincipalName doesn't work with OpenLDAP
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: akshay.polji(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Recently I was trying to perform a POC that included the Hashicorp vault.
I tried to configure Hashicorp Vault LDAP login using OpenLDAP.
However, I failed to do so as the Hashicorp vault was trying to query the
OpenLDAP with filter="(?userPrincipalName=test1(a)example.com)"
I got the query o/p as
conn=1146 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=32 nentries=0 text=
onn=1146 fd=12 closed (connection lost)
Even though the ldapsearch worked for the same user.
The problem seems to be the fact that OpenLDAP doesn't support
"userPrincipalName" as the attribute.
Wanted to understand if 'userPrincipalName' could be added?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9000
--- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to sebastien.chaumat from comment #7)
> This bug is still present in 2.4.49 (ubuntu).
The OpenLDAP 2.4 series is historic and out of support.
The memberof overlay is deprecated in OpenLDAP 2.5 and later and the dynlist
overlay should be used to provide memberOf support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9000
--- Comment #7 from sebastien.chaumat(a)qspin.be ---
This bug is still present in 2.4.49 (ubuntu).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8375
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.6.2 |2.7.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9792
Issue ID: 9792
Summary: During replication, slapd tries to modify
hasSubordinates (and fails)
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.9
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: christophe(a)armaghast.eu
Target Milestone: ---
During relication, this strange error occurs:
Jan 25 14:46:42 annu slapd[471040]: conn=1001 op=2796 MOD attr=userPassword
pwdChangedTime pwdHistory entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp
hasSubordinates
Jan 25 14:46:42 annu slapd[471040]: conn=1001 op=2796 RESULT tag=103 err=16
qtime=0.000030 etime=0.000462 text=modify/delete: hasSubordinates: no such
attribute
Why does slapd try to modify this (virtual) attribute ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9350
Issue ID: 9350
Summary: Expand test suite for null base
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Currently we have no tests that use the empty suffix (null base).
This is an entirely valid configuration setup, and there are unique challenges
and bugs that crop up with this usage.
We need to ensure we're covering this use case, particularly with syncrepl and
delta-syncrepl configurations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/487 for the
clarification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.