https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs_review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882
--- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Tamim provided me the source code previously referenced, now attached to the
ticket.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9833
Issue ID: 9833
Summary: Backup Restore issue
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: akshay.jain(a)shopclues.com
Target Milestone: ---
I Have restored backup from running ldap. data is restored but i am not able to
login using directory manager account.
This is hampering my production.
Can anyone help in this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9828
Issue ID: 9828
Summary: ldap_count_values_len broken
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Pointer confusion means ldap_count_values_len does not work as intended.
Because there are no known users in the openldap project (except slapd-search),
this has existed since its inception in UMich code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9620
Issue ID: 9620
Summary: back-monitor: search can access a persistent entry
freed in the meantime
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
With ITS#9600 there is now code that adds and removes "persistent" monitor
entries outside a server pause. A concurrent cn=monitor search lists all
children first and sends them later - monitor is happy to free some of them in
the meantime.
It seems to me that the monitor cache should be protected by a rw mutex
instead, which would be held for reading while a search is happening.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9826
Issue ID: 9826
Summary: Openldap process stopped due to the 'segmentation
fault'
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: rekha.shivsan(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 892
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=892&action=edit
kernel logs with segmentation fault error
Openldap process stopped due to the 'segmentation fault'. We have openldap
process running as a service.
/var/log/kern.log
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-x kernel: show_signal_msg: 48 callbacks suppressed
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-x kernel: slapd[8778]: segfault at 8 ip
00000000004afcc6 sp 00007fae42ffd400 error 4 in slapd[400000+130000]
/var/log/daemon.log
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-xopenldap: 622497b5 connection_read(13): input
error=-2 id=19912, closing.
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-xopenldap: 622497b5 connection_closing: readying
conn=19912 sd=13 for close
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-xsystemd: openldap.service: main process exited,
code=killed, status=11/SEGV
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-xsystemd: Unit openldap.service entered failed state.
Mar 6 11:15:01 ip-x-x-x-xsystemd: openldap.service failed.
If we restart the service, it runs fine for few days and again segmentation
fault is seen in kernel logs and the service gets stopped.
Please help us to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rekha.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9784
Issue ID: 9784
Summary: Adding our OpenLDAP support services
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: contact(a)linuxstans.com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
We offer OpenLDAP support and we'd really appreciate it if you can add our
details to your support page https://www.openldap.org/support/
Here are the details:
<a href="https://linuxstans.com/support/">Linux Stans</a> - USA
Provides installation, configuration, maintenance, and 24/7 support services
for OpenLDAP.
Let me know if you need more info.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9819
Issue ID: 9819
Summary: Bump version of ldapc++
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: jengelh(a)inai.de
Target Milestone: ---
In the *SUSE family of Linux distributions, we have had a standalone ldapcpp
package, the code of which was authored by R. Haferkamp; the package is marked
0.3.1 inside and out and uses SONAME=libldapcpp.so.1. This ldapcpp package is
being phased out in favor of building the software from the copy in
openldap/contrib/ldapc++, which I find is also by Haferkamp. However, it is
marked as 0.0.0 and uses SONAME=libldapcpp.so.0.
----
» abidiff /usr/lib64/libldapcpp.so.1 .libs/libldapcpp.so.0
ELF SONAME changed
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 4 Changed, 2 Added (30 filtered out)
functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
Function symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 9 Added function symbols not
referenced by debug info
Variable symbols changes summary: 0 Removed, 1 Added variable symbol not
referenced by debug info
SONAME changed from 'libldapcpp.so.1' to 'libldapcpp.so.0'
2 Added functions:
[A] 'method virtual LDAPMsg::~LDAPMsg(int)' {_ZN7LDAPMsgD0Ev}
note that this adds a new entry to the vtable of class LDAPMsg
[A] 'method virtual LDAPMsg::~LDAPMsg(int)' {_ZN7LDAPMsgD2Ev, aliases
_ZN7LDAPMsgD1Ev}
note that this adds a new entry to the vtable of class LDAPMsg
4 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
[C] 'method void LDAPAsynConnection::unbind()' at
LDAPAsynConnection.cpp:270:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'int' was added
[C] 'method LDAPAttrType::LDAPAttrType()' at LDAPAttrType.cpp:11:1 has some
indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'int' was added
[C] 'method LDAPAttributeList::LDAPAttributeList()' at
LDAPAttributeList.cpp:24:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'int' was added
[C] 'method LDAPSchema::LDAPSchema()' at LDAPSchema.cpp:18:1 has some
indirect sub-type changes:
parameter 1 of type 'int' was added
9 Added function symbols not referenced by debug info:
[A] _ZN12LDAPAttrTypeC1ERKS_
[A] _ZN12LDAPAttrTypeC2ERKS_, aliases _ZN12LDAPAttrTypeC1ERKS_
[A] _ZN13LDAPExceptionC1ERKS_, aliases _ZN13LDAPExceptionC2ERKS_
[A] _ZN13LDAPExceptionC2ERKS_
[A] _ZN16LDAPUrlExceptionD1Ev
[A] _ZN16LDAPUrlExceptionD2Ev, aliases _ZN16LDAPUrlExceptionD1Ev
[A] _ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED0Ev
[A] _ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED1Ev, aliases
_ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED2Ev
[A] _ZNSt7__cxx1115basic_stringbufIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED2Ev
1 Added variable symbol not referenced by debug info:
[A] _ZTV7LDAPMsg
----
This leads me to believe that contrib/ldapc++ is actually the newer one despite
the inferior versioning.
To avoid confusion going forward, I propose to bump the version (in the
`version.var` file) to at least 0.3.1, and the SONAME should be changed to
libldapcpp.so.2 (now), so that future maintainers won't accidentally reuse
libldapcpp.so.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.